Today, the European Parliament adopted a report by the special committee on foreign interference in all democratic processes in the European Union, including disinformation.

Here are key points on how to fight in democratic processes 🧵⤵️

1/14

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/EPPGroup/stat

The Russian invasion of Ukraine clearly shows the link between foreign attempts to manipulate information, posing threats to the EU and overall world security and stability.

2/14

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/EPPGroup/stat

Close and ongoing cooperation with Ukraine is needed to build resilience and fight hybrid attacks.

3/14

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/EPPGroup/stat

Reality is harsh - theoretical discussions about risks and possible future conflicts, potential threats or technologies have become reality - thousands of Ukrainians give their lives every month, fighting for their freedom and ours.

4/14

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/EPPGroup/stat

A special funding program for NGOs engaged in disinformation research and building media literacy in society should be established at the EU level. Currently, EU funding for such NGOs is insufficient, fragmented, and not planned for the long-term.

5/14

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/EPPGroup/stat

The European Council must immediately establish a special sanctions regime against states, organisations, and individuals engaged in deliberate disinformation intended to destabilise democratic processes, especially elections in the EU.

6/14

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/EPPGroup/stat

The European Commission should create a better-coordinated unified system to combat foreign interference and disinformation; there is currently a lack of strategic coordination and political oversight.

7/14

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/EPPGroup/stat

Online platforms should be held responsible for the dissemination of harmful content. The current system, in which online platform owners can voluntarily take on obligations, has proven ineffective.

8/14

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/EPPGroup/stat

A negative example is Twitter, which recently withdrew from the European Union's Code of Practice against Disinformation.


9/14

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/EPPGroup/stat

Efforts should be made to prevent attempts at foreign interference using critical infrastructure and strategic sectors. This includes not allowing the use of equipment from high-risk country manufacturers, for example, Huawei, ZTE, Kaspersky, Nuctech,etc.

10/14

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/EPPGroup/stat

Ports of EU countries should not be allowed to come under the ownership or leading influence of authoritarian third countries; any covert attempts to influence educational institutions must be prevented.

11/14

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/EPPGroup/stat

Equally important is for Member States to constantly ensure the financial and editorial independence of the media.

12/14

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/EPPGroup/stat

Follow

At the same time, non-governmental organisations that promote media literacy in society and provide fact-checking should have a proper and stable funding base at the EU level to ensure their uninterrupted operations.

13/14

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/EPPGroup/stat

· · mirror-bot · 1 · 0 · 0

All of this together will build resilience in society against hostile disinformation and the ability to withstand hybrid warfare challenges.

14/14

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/EPPGroup/stat

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

A Mastodon forum for the discussion of European Union matters. Not run by the EU. Powered by PleromaBot, Nitter and PrivacyDev.net.