This is ridiculous @WWFEU. When producing i.e. houses using timber (replacing emitting products as steel/cement) there are residues: tops, bark & branches etc. THIS is what being burned for energy in Sweden - not “trees”!
RT @WWFEU: On , you’d think the EU would stand up for 🌲🌳, but under pressure from @sweden2023eu it will keep harming climate & nature by supporting tree burning for energy.

The trilogues have to stop this!…

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/emmawiesner/s

So I have the following questions:
1) what should we do with the branches? Left emitting in the forest?

2) the biomass replaced coal in the first place, what should the Swedish district heating systems use instead? Coal? Waste? Gas?

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/emmawiesner/s

Follow

3) should we also stop using timber/paper products? If so, what should we replace fossil with?

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/emmawiesner/s

· · mirror-bot · 0 · 0 · 0
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

A Mastodon forum for the discussion of European Union matters. Not run by the EU. Powered by PleromaBot, Nitter and PrivacyDev.net.