Show newer

Re 2) The evidence is really really weak. Depending on your specification you get that chemo increases, leaves the same, or reduces cancer. Again, analysis from your colleague Dr. Valery R.

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

Maybe some high school student will pick it up better this way?
<div class="rsshub-quote">
Anthony Bonato: Taylor Swift as math functions, for all the Swifties. A thread.
y = -x
</div>

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

RT John Cochrane
Great summary story from Luis Garicano. It starts with doctor F who says you can’t see how well the drug works because of long and variable lags…
<div class="rsshub-quote">
Luis Garicano 🇪🇺🇺🇦: Must read blog (and series of blogs!) by @JohnHCochrane on what we really know on the impact of interest rates on inflation.
Summary: very little.
A tiny thread on identification explaining the last blog with an analogy, specially for non-economists.
johnhcochrane.blogspot.com/202
</div>

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/JohnHCochrane

RT John Cochrane
Re @lugaricano One possibility: if they change drug or dose because of something truly unrelated to disease, like taste of drug. Ie funds rate moves due to something other than future inflation or its causes. But what?

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/JohnHCochrane

RT Oleg Itskhoki
RU ruble depreciated ~100% since its peak of 53 rub/USD last summer to ~100 now. The pace⬆️ this summer since Prigozhin mutiny and expropriations of West./private companies
Time to step up fin+export sanctions to further limit fiscal space for Putin’s war efforts in 🇺🇦/elsewhere

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/itskhoki/stat

Agree. Very good. Shame on the Austrians for not protecting Grozev and on @elonmusk for entirely lacking the ability to differentiate Good and Evil.
<div class="rsshub-quote">
Francis Fukuyama: Great interview: Bellingcat’s Christo Grozev: ‘Prigozhin will either be dead or there will be a second coup’ ft.com/content/03f220e1-6a7e-4
</div>

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

RT Ivan Werning
Argentine presidential elections: a libertarian economist (associates with the Austrian school) garnered most votes yesterday.
Far from decisive but relevant: these were primaries, but open ones (you vote for any party) making them a relevant barometer for true elections.

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/IvanWerning/s

Different policies and growth forecasts follow two interpretations of China's stagnation:
-Keynesian: need more stimulus! in @TheEconomist leader economist.com/leaders/2023/08/
- Institutional: arbitrariness/lack of rule of law, in @adamposen's essay foreignaffairs.com/china/end-c
Your view?

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

RT David Frum
Trump looks likely to clinch the Republican presidential nomination and be convicted of multiple federal crimes - all in the same few weeks.
<div class="rsshub-quote">
Garrett Haake: The Special Counsel has just proposed a Jan 2nd trial date for the Trump/2020 election case, which they say should take 4-6 weeks.
Overlaid with the GOP political calendar, that means the trial would start during pre-Iowa sprint, and run through the entire early state window.
</div>

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/davidfrum/sta

Late to this great thread.
<div class="rsshub-quote">
Beatrice Cherrier: 1/There’s this economist few remember, who wrote the 1st 2-sectors growth model, brought Pontryagin to econ, played rugby w/ Inada, argue over Marxism &amp; Keynes w/ Solow &amp; Kahn, rediscovered Veblen &amp; ended up contributing to a papal encyclical.
His name is Hiro Uzawa (宇沢弘文)
</div>

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

Interesting paper. Finds more inertia, less variability when shopping online than offline. Appears to indicate higher switching cost (and hence barriers to entry) online.
<div class="rsshub-quote">
Jūra Liaukonytė: 1/3 Excited to share that our paper, co-authored with @saichandc and @nccyang, exploring the differences between online and offline grocery shopping, has been accepted for publication in @Mrktng_Science!
You can find the full paper here:
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf
</div>

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

Re @petercoy Nice piece, but you ignore selection into marriage: e.g. are the cohabitating couples and the married ones otherwise similar? Whatever explains the different choice could explain also the apparent advantages of marriage.

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

RT Michael Reid
Not long ago Ecuador was a haven of peace in the Andes. Organised crime has grown there with terrifying speed. Fernando Villavicencio was an anti-corruption campaigner and a democrat. RIP theguardian.com/world/2023/aug

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/michaelreid52

The free market newspaper of record thinks that the Communist Party of China is too fiscally responsible and needs to invest more in white elephants.
Not a word about how absence of rule of law and legal insecurity constrains investment. economist.com/leaders/2023/08/

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

The USA insane gun (and drug) policies are responsible for the violence engulfing Ecuador.
Mexico cannot win against the cartels while they have access to $$$ and guns from across the border.
Mexico militarized the response and the cartels militarized back, buying US weapons.

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

Re @Birdyword Hi @Birdyword , I don't know to whom this should be addressed. Your calls are usually impeccable, hence my suprise.
n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st
<div class="rsshub-quote">
Luis Garicano 🇪🇺🇺🇦: The free market newspaper of record thinks that the Communist Party of China is too fiscally responsible and needs to invest more in white elephants.
Not a word about how absence of rule of law and legal insecurity constrains investment. economist.com/leaders/2023/08/
</div>

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

Example: "The rise in US gun sales to Guatemala has been among the steepest in the world. ... In just a few years the number of murders has risen. ... many on the receiving end ... are ill equipped to handle the influx"
And this is just legal exports:
bloomberg.com/graphics/2023-us
<div class="rsshub-quote">
Luis Garicano 🇪🇺🇺🇦: The USA insane gun (and drug) policies are responsible for the violence engulfing Ecuador.
Mexico cannot win against the cartels while they have access to $$$ and guns from across the border.
Mexico militarized the response and the cartels militarized back, buying US weapons.
</div>

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

Show older
Mastodon

A Mastodon forum for the discussion of European Union matters. Not run by the EU. Powered by PleromaBot, Nitter and PrivacyDev.net.