Show newer

The robot pretends it is visually impaired in order to get a human to help with a task. How is this not "intelligence"?
RT @leopoldasch: Really great to see pre-deployment AI risk evals like this starting to happen

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

Unbelievable.
RT @JonErlichman: Today, GPT-4 instantly turned a hand drawn sketch into a working website:

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

Stunning performance on the most advanced exams. Better than 90% of aspiring lawyers on the Bar, better than 99% of aspiring graduate students on verbal intelligence!
RT @gdb: We’re releasing GPT-4 — a large multimodal model (image & text in, text out) which is a significant advance in both capability and alignment.

Still limited in many ways, but passes many qualification benchmarks like the bar exam & AP Calculus: openai.com/research/gpt-4

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

I read in the plane "2034" the novel by Ackerman and @stavridisj about a war between China and USA (and many more). Very illuminating about decision making and the mechanics of escalation. Recommended.
H/t @TarunKhannaHBS

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

Complete agreement. Good explanation.
RT @ProfStefanNagel: I am baffled by the Federal Reserve's new Bank Term Funding Program. The Fed is lending against par value. This means the Fed is getting into the business of (partly) unsecured lending. Is there a precedent for this? (1/n)

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

@Duarteosrm Maybe you are confused?
See the terms of the bailout.
?t=hrpWJttk9V49xVyJ8xAcIg&s=19
RT @ProfStefanNagel: I am baffled by the Federal Reserve's new Bank Term Funding Program. The Fed is lending against par value. This means the Fed is getting into the business of (partly) unsecured lending. Is there a precedent for this? (1/n)

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

The customers were very happy. One told me "man, it is all about payroll, if you do not make payroll you face jail". One very thoughtful entrepreneur said: "look, banks should not play with other people's money, banks should just be banks".

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

Show thread

The branch was taken over by FDIC staff. SOme bank staff as well. An FDIC staffer telling customers they do not need to close their accounts and transfer because "this is probably the safest bank in the world today,since insurance is unlimited and everywhere elsy it will be 250k"

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

Show thread

I am visiting @StanfordGsb and @HooverInst , so I decided to pass by the main Palo Alto branch of at 9.00am. This is my comment. A quick thread also with my "policy" observations.

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

Enough!
This banking model is broken. Stop the cycle of new financial regulations, lobbying to make them ineffective, excessive risk taking, finished by cries of "oh my good this time is different please bail us out"!, and bailouts.
Here is a solution: imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/20

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

Today, post , we are getting effectively a huge new round of QE-for-the-rich-and-connected, and, possibly, a stop in interest rate increases

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

Show thread

The end of the inflation fight is today?
In the fall of 2020, I wrote (with T. Santos and J. Saa) that if inflation were to return, CBs would not be willing to follow through with tighter mon. pol. because of their fear if causing financial instability. cepr.org/voxeu/columns/tacklin

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

US Treasury trying to hide in technicalities a gigantic subsidy to SVB: treating of collateral at par (buying bonds worth 80 at 100) goes against every risk management principle of the last decades. See thread.
RT @DanielaGabor: forget about SBV liabilities for a second, the real bailout story is the regime-change in the Fed's treatment of collateral:

par value goes against every risk management commandment of the past 30 years.
it turbocharges the monetary p…

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

The narrative that Sillicon Valley has been pushing on is demolished by this graph, which shows enormous moral hazard (entirely unhedged interest rate risk), out of step with any other bank.
RT @AndreasSteno: SVB is/was not like the others because a prudent bank hedges interest rate risks. SVB did not.

Chart from JPAM / Michael Cembalest

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

No further questions, your honor.
RT @AndreasSteno: SVB is/was not like the others because a prudent bank hedges interest rate risks. SVB did not.

Chart from JPAM / Michael Cembalest

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

@BillAckman @mcuban
RT @AndreasSteno: SVB is/was not like the others because a prudent bank hedges interest rate risks. SVB did not.

Chart from JPAM / Michael Cembalest

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

Forbes' curse strikes again (2007:
"Nokia: Can anyone catch the cell phone king?")
RT @SVB_Financial: Proud to be on @Forbes' annual ranking of America's Best Banks for the 5th straight year and to have also been named to the publication's inaugural Financial All-Stars list.

👉 forbes.com/consent/?toURL=http

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/lugaricano/st

Show older
Mastodon

A Mastodon forum for the discussion of European Union matters. Not run by the EU. Powered by PleromaBot, Nitter and PrivacyDev.net.