We should remember that attempts to contain Russia by offering economic partnership failed. Putin was in fact emboldened by our flexibility, not persuaded. Similar tactics would also embolden China. Let's not make the same mistake twice.

🐦🔗: https://n.respublicae.eu/GLandsbergis/status/1643174404271087617

The lure of Pax Sinica can be diminished if we strengthen the rules-based order that already exists and ensure that it remains the fairest and most reliable proposition for most of the world’s countries.

🐦🔗: https://n.respublicae.eu/GLandsbergis/status/1643174410709344256

Preaching de-risking while marching ahead with business-as-usual is not an option. Surely we have learnt that increasing dependencies on totalitarian states weakens us as we discard the principles that made us strong.

🐦🔗: https://n.respublicae.eu/GLandsbergis/status/1643174416988119040

We must get serious. De-risking is a much-needed quick fix but we must also be ready for what might follow. We are woefully unprepared for the possibility that Xi’s trajectory might ultimately leave us no choice but to decouple.

🐦🔗: https://n.respublicae.eu/GLandsbergis/status/1643174420834398208

Defending all of Ukraine is absolutely the best way to show any potential allies of China that we will always defend the rules-based order that enables stability and therefore prosperity.

🐦🔗: https://n.respublicae.eu/GLandsbergis/status/1643174425359941632

To maintain the rules-based order we will have to consider reshaping international political, trade and financial institutions. Where reshaping is not an option, we must consider creating new structures.

🐦🔗: https://n.respublicae.eu/GLandsbergis/status/1643174429818605570

Finally, we must be very clear that there will be severe consequences if China tries to violate the rules-based international order. This cannot be empty talk. We must be well prepared for where all of this might take us.

🐦🔗: https://n.respublicae.eu/GLandsbergis/status/1643174433958379520