Why aren’t we sending Ukraine all the tools needed to end the war? Why are we avoiding specifics during the debate on Ukraine‘s membership of NATO? Because the belief is still alive that after the war we can return to business as usual, as if February 24th was just a glitch.
🐦🔗: https://n.respublicae.eu/GLandsbergis/status/1599441986288656385
The tactic of leaving Russia undefeated and ready for future partnership is toxic. It leads to calls to end the war by negotiation instead of ending it with a Ukrainian victory. Some even suggest Ukrainian territorial concessions to the invaders as a gift.
🐦🔗: https://n.respublicae.eu/GLandsbergis/status/1599441990462365696
That isn’t how the rules-based international order works. Russia shouldn’t get invited to ‘peace’ negotiations as a reward for brutally invading, occupying and murdering its neighbours again and again.
🐦🔗: https://n.respublicae.eu/GLandsbergis/status/1599441994186575872
International organisations completely failed to prevent conflict of a magnitude unseen in Europe since WW2. At the very least there must be change within those organizations. But we should not rule out the possibility of some organisations disappearing and new ones forming.
🐦🔗: https://n.respublicae.eu/GLandsbergis/status/1599442003623743488
With previous conflicts in Europe, the security architecture was rethought after the fighting ended, new structures appeared. For example, the United Nations appeared after mistakes made during the League of Nations era.
🐦🔗: https://n.respublicae.eu/GLandsbergis/status/1599442007822213120
First Russia has to face defeat on the battlefield. For that Ukraine needs all our help. All the weapons, all the assistance we can give. Otherwise Russia will continue trying to reinvent the continent according to its own imperialist world vision.
🐦🔗: https://n.respublicae.eu/GLandsbergis/status/1599442011664228353
It is in Europe's interest to fight off and defeat the invader. After this defeat a new system needs to be created out of the lessons learnt from previous mistakes.
🐦🔗: https://n.respublicae.eu/GLandsbergis/status/1599442015779172353
Reliance on economic exchange as a principle of mutual assurance, desecuritization, veto power on security issues given to the aggressors – these are some of the misconceptions which failed to ensure the safety of the continent.
🐦🔗: https://n.respublicae.eu/GLandsbergis/status/1599442019905990656
Our strategy needs to be rethought and reflected in a new security architecture that will ensure the safety of the continent for decades to come. And we should start creating this new system with Ukraine, not with Putin’s Russia.
🐦🔗: https://n.respublicae.eu/GLandsbergis/status/1599442023806685185
The creeping normalisation of Russia's actions is fundamentally wrong. Also misguided is the belief that the current security architecture of multilateral regional and global organizations must be preserved as the ‘best we have’.
🐦🔗: https://n.respublicae.eu/GLandsbergis/status/1599441998477348865