Back to the and beginning with my concerns about a proposed ‘Super Complaints’ system run by Ofcom. There is the potential for certain organisations' complaints to be taken more seriously than individuals. Others want an Ombudsman - hmm.

youtu.be/TFFYjF8t3zA

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/Fox_Claire/st

More bureaucrats? NB most speaking assume complaints will be about Big Tech NOT removing harmful content. My concern is, who do you complain to when your content is removed/censored?

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/Fox_Claire/st

Later, I asked for a quick clarification from the government about how the public/individuals complain about problematic actions taken by Big Tech (which may well be brought about by this legislation).

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/Fox_Claire/st

How should Big Tech deal with the horrors of online encouragement of self harm/suicide sites? Good question- but why is there no mention of social contagion of gender dysphoria & those who promote tools of self harm (eg chest binders/double mastectomies)?

youtu.be/rIhbig7Q8Ro

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/Fox_Claire/st

My worry is that too many want the to be more censorious, to pick and choose what are harms and avoid the bigger issue of an offline social/cultural problem.

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/Fox_Claire/st

Follow

Another speech - highlighting the problems of what is described as 'online misogyny' being conflated with physical violence. There is a difference between speech (however horrible) and action...

youtu.be/oZTWG-QKupw

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/Fox_Claire/st

· · mirror-bot · 1 · 0 · 0

...Yes, it's toxic on here. Yes, lots of abuse is sexist. BUT there is a danger of an over-stated panic that treats women as inherently fragile, needing special protection. (All while ignoring real anti-women threats coming from trans activists, as it happens.)

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/Fox_Claire/st

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

A Mastodon forum for the discussion of European Union matters. Not run by the EU. Powered by PleromaBot, Nitter and PrivacyDev.net.