#ECJHighlights 15&17/11
⚖️ (J): Recognition of extrajudicial divorces #BrusselsIIbis (C-646/20)
⚖️ (J): #StateAid to airports #Italy - @volotea & @easyJet (2 cases)
⚖️ (O): Anti-dumping Regulation's conformity with #ChineseAccessionProtocol #Changmao (C-123/21 P)
🐦🔗: https://nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/1590996037074038792
This account is being discontinued. Please follow @Curia!
https://social.network.europa.eu/@Curia
#ECJ: The disclosure of ‘relevant evidence’ includes documents that a party may be required to create by compiling or classifying information, knowledge or data in its possession 👉https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/Jo2_7052/
🐦🔗: https://nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/1590627447594438656
#ECJ upholds #EUGeneralCourt ruling on #StateAid granted by #Spain to @valenciacf_en. @EU_Commission appeal dismissed #football 👉https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/Jo2_7052/
🐦🔗: https://nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/1590627355587842048
To see all of our past tweets celebrating 70 years of the #CJEU, just click the hashtag #CJEUin70days and make sure to follow us.
🐦🔗: https://nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/1590386769421168640
#2006: The Court found that Directive 98/5/EC did not provide for any condition other than that for the lawyer to produce, at the bar of the host Member State, a certificate of registration in his Member State of origin.
🐦🔗: https://nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/1590386766577831936
#2006: A Luxembourg law made the practice of the legal profession conditional on proficiency in the administrative and judicial languages of that Member State, namely French, German and Luxembourgish, and also imposed a prior control of these knowledge.
🐦🔗: https://nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/1590386763671162882
#2006: In the Wilson (C-506/04) and Commission/Luxembourg (C-193/05) cases, the Court held that every lawyer has the right to practise on a permanent basis, in any Member State, under his original professional title, without prior checking of their language skills.
🐦🔗: https://nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/1590386760684818433
Over the year we will be tweeting a thread for each of the Court's 70 years of existence. Today: #2006 #CJEUin70Days
🐦🔗: https://nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/1590386756926726144
#EUGeneralCourt confirms the fines ranging from €2.2m to €5.1 million imposed by the @EU_Commission on four companies for their participation in a cartel on the Italian concrete reinforcing bars market 👉https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/Jo2_7052/
🐦🔗: https://nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/1590267402759319553
#EUGeneralCourt confirms @EU_Commission’s communication that no further legislation was necessary at this stage to achieve the objectives sought by the European citizens' initiative "Minority SafePack - one million signatures for diversity in Europe" 👉https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/Jo2_7052/
🐦🔗: https://nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/1590267262245609472
#ECJ annuls the @EU_Commission decision that had found that #Luxembourg #taxruling concerning @fiat constituted #StateAid incompatible with the internal market 👉 https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/Jo2_7052/
🐦🔗: https://nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/1589908759089905665
#ECJ: national judges are required to verify on their own initiative the legality of a detention measure taken with regard to a foreign national residing illegally or an #asylum seeker 👉 https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/Jo2_7052/
🐦🔗: https://nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/1589908661165604864
#ECJ: it should be possible for approved environmental associations to bring legal proceedings to challenge an EC type-approval of vehicles equipped with ‘defeat devices’ that may be prohibited #Dieselgate #environment 👉 https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/Jo2_7052/
🐦🔗: https://nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/1589908402708193281
To see all of our past tweets celebrating 70 years of the #CJEU, just click the hashtag #CJEUin70days and make sure to follow us.
🐦🔗: https://nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/1589632590901694471
#2005 is also the year in which the Civil Service Tribunal took office.
🐦🔗: https://nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/1589632541329195008
#2005: The Court therefore found that it had not been demonstrated that setting an age threshold, independently of any other consideration, was objectively necessary to achieve the objective of employing workers unemployed elderly.
🐦🔗: https://nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/1589631115828277249
#2005: Member States have a wide margin of discretion in achieving their employment objectives, but such legislation would represent, for a category of workers, a risk of exclusion from the benefit of the stability of the use.
🐦🔗: https://nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/1589629851631517697
#2005: The Court recognised that the legislation in question, allowing the conclusion of fixed-term employment contracts for all workers who have reached the age of 52, had the legitimate aim of promoting the occupational integration of older workers in unemployment.
🐦🔗: https://nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/1589628807220457474
#2005: In the Mangold judgment (C-144/04), the Court of Justice ruled on the prohibition of discrimination based on age.
🐦🔗: https://nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/1589628438050394112
Unofficial mirror. No copyright asserted. ∎ Official account of the Press Service of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Please see our Twitter policy here: https://www.curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/P_91153/