Show newer

✔️4: Cases at the Court can be argued in any of the 24 Official Languages. Wherever necessary, written submissions are translated and oral arguments benefit from simultaneous interpretation.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

✔️3: They are appointed by common accord of the governments of the Member States for a term of six years, after consultation of the panel provided for in Article 255.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

✔️3: The members the Court are chosen from persons whose independence is beyond doubt and who possess the qualifications required for appointment to the highest judicial offices in their respective countries or who are jurisconsults of recognised competence.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

✔️2: The particular Article mentioned, Art.82 GDPR hasn’t yet been the subject of a Court judgment. But did you know you can search for judgments referencing specific articles on legislation via our case law search?

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

✔️2: Interpretation of is one of the fundamental tasks of the . The Court interprets EU law only in cases brought before it. It does not issue advisory opinions outside the parameters of a case.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

✔️1 In both cases the issue can end up before the if it is asked to interpret the applicable .
For more information on how the protects consumer rights watch our video 👉youtu.be/BNlaD20Ec7g or check out this brochure 👉curia.europa.eu/jcms/jcms/p1_2

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

✔️1Consumers have a number of remedies in such cases. They can try to enforce their rights before national courts or report such practices to consumer associations.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

❓1 Can the do anything to protect EU consumers against companies that ignore laws on commercial practices?

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

The judgment is sent to the referring court which is bound to apply the interpretation given by the to the facts before it.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

On the day of the pronouncement the judgment is read out in Court and is made available in all the official languages of the .

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

The process of deliberation leads to a final judgment that is a collegial decision of all the judges in the Chamber. The judgment is then sent for translation and a date for the pronouncement is set.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

The reporting judge will provide the first drafts of the judgment and these are discussed in Chamber either orally or through an exchange of notes.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

Once the Opinion is published, the Chamber will decide whether or not it will follow the Advocate General’s suggestions and the process of deliberation begins including the drafting of the judgment.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

Where the reporting judge opts for an Opinion, the next step following a hearing is the publication of the Advocate General’s Opinion. An Opinion is a non-binding suggestion formulated by an Advocate-General on how the case may be decided.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

During a hearing, parties tend to supplement the arguments that have already been submitted in writing. The judges will also ask further questions where necessary in order to complete the information needed to decide the case.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

Si la a opté pour une audience de plaidoiries, celle-ci se tiendra dans la langue de procédure. Les audiences sont publiques et sont désormais également diffusées en ligne (Grande chambre). Des services d' sont disponibles lors de l’audience

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

If the has opted for a hearing this will be held in the language of the case. Hearings are public and are now also streamed online (Grand Chamber only). services are available during a hearing.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

Show older
Mastodon

A Mastodon forum for the discussion of European Union matters. Not run by the EU. Powered by PleromaBot, Nitter and PrivacyDev.net.