Show newer

Chambers can be made up of three, five or fifteen judges or the Court may exceptionally judge in Plenary.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

A weekly general meeting of the judges of the Court will decide whether to follow the reporting judges’ recommendations and eventually attributes the Case to a particular Chamber.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

The reporting judge also recommends the size of the Chamber that should be attributed the Case, whether an Opinion is required and whether there should be a Hearing.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

The Case is attributed to a reporting judge who will draft a Preliminary Report outlining the legal issues at stake.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

Translation at the is done by lawyer linguists who are specialised in both law and language. Lawyer-linguists provide added expertise in the different legal traditions of the member states.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

All the documents and submissions in the Case are translated into French which is the language of deliberation among judges.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

The Case is given its specific sequential number that will be its reference number from here on e.g. C-XX/22. It is publishedin the Official Journal of the . This allows other parties time to intervene should they have an interest in its outcome.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

Research and Documentation services conduct a detailed analysis of the subject matter including a comparative analysis as well as an overview of past cases where the has dealt with similar matters.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

The point of entry at the is the Registry where the request is checked to ensure that all formal requirements are fulfilled. At this stage an early analysis of the content of the case also takes place.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

In such cases, the referring Court will suspend national proceedings for the duration of the reference. The questions are sent to the in the language of the referring Court.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

Questions of can arise in cases before the Courts of different Member States. Through the preliminary reference procedure, these Courts may request the for assistance in answering these questions.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

Happy ! This year's is all about the life of a case at the Court. We will follow a preliminary reference by a national court from start to judgment.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/


⚖️ 11/05 (J): @Condor rescue aid @Ryanair (T-577/20)
⚖️ 12/05 (J): working and employment conditions - (C-426/20)
⚖️ 12/05 (J): sales market - opening up to @EnelGroup (C-377/20)

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

To see all of our past tweets celebrating 70 years of the , just click the hashtag and make sure to follow us.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

#1965: In addition the Court considered that social security institutions of a Member State can bring an action, on conditions laid down therein, for the reimbursement of benefits granted in consequence of an accident even if it occurred before 1 January 1959.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

#1965: In Singer (44-65), the Court ruled that Regulation 3 concerning social security for workers is not limited solely to migrant workers or solely to workers required to move for the purpose of their employment.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

#1965: the number of cases brought before the Court continued to increase. In 1965, 68 cases were lodged before the Court.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

Over the year we will be tweeting a thread for each of the Court's 70 years of existence. Today: #1965

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/EUCourtPress/status/

Show older
Mastodon

A Mastodon forum for the discussion of European Union matters. Not run by the EU. Powered by PleromaBot, Nitter and PrivacyDev.net.