During today's debate on “Future legislative reform of the Framework in times of social and economic crisis” I emphasized: reforms are good if they are effective, bring tangible results and imply less burden.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/GyoriEniko/status/15

Concerning the COM proposal, there are more questions than answers.

I asked the COM what the guarantee is that debt sustainability calculations are well-founded and they lead to simplification.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/GyoriEniko/status/15

Follow

There are doubts also about compatibility of the new tool for the verification of the implementation of the reforms & investments  with economic & debt sustainability.

As a non-euro zone MEP I also asked how this new instrument will relate to the excessive deficit procedure.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/GyoriEniko/status/15

· · mirror-bot · 1 · 0 · 0

The COM proposal entails the risk that the procedures become excessively subjective and the Commission's competences would increase. By this Member States‘ ownership  over the whole procedure is more than dubious.

🐦🔗: nitter.eu/GyoriEniko/status/15

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

A Mastodon forum for the discussion of European Union matters. Not run by the EU. Powered by PleromaBot, Nitter and PrivacyDev.net.