@jonat5nu @CEIBois @ForestDefence Two separate issues here. First an individual wooden building can be carbon negative if it stores & substitutes more carbon than was emitted in its construction. Second only 3% of construction is currently timber hence we don't foresee a 100% figure hence an 'only 40% reduction'.

🐦🔗: https://nitter.eu/PaulBrannenNE/status/1596833261896241152