Is the
https://nitter.cz/search?q=%23FitFor55
program not such a good idea anymore? Today, the Brussels-based
https://nitter.cz/POLITICOEurope
website, owned by the German concern Axel Springer, published an article containing doubts surrounding the EU's radical energy transformation policy, known as
https://nitter.cz/search?q=%23FitFor55
. Politico draws attention to the enormous social and political costs of the transformation, citing data from the European Commission that suggests
https://nitter.cz/search?q=%23FitFor55
may cause 180,000 job losses in mining and as many as 500,000 job losses in the automotive industry.
Yes, it is true that
https://nitter.cz/search?q=%23FitFor55
means a great risk for the economies of the EU member states. Also, it deprives EU countries' industries of the possibility to be competitive. I have been talking about this in the European Parliament for a long time; however, in recent years, the energy transition has been treated as almost sacred among Brussels officials. The European Parliament and the European Commission supported its implementation. The question becomes, why would the approach towards
https://nitter.cz/search?q=%23FitFor55
suddenly start to change?
Interestingly, the Politico text places the entire responsibility for the way
https://nitter.cz/search?q=%23FitFor55
is run on Frans Timmermans. Timmermans, as Commissioner, actually led this project but he was not the one who approved all the solutions. It was a policy approved by the Brussels elites, headed by Ursula von der Leyen. The current Politico publication looks as if the search for a scapegoat has begun.
After Brussels has been stubbornly striving to implement
https://nitter.cz/search?q=%23FitFor55
for several years, it now - just as stubbornly - wants to change the EU Treaties and practically transform the Union into a federation. As with
https://nitter.cz/search?q=%23FitFor…

🐦🔗: https://nitter.cz/BeataSzydlo/status/1725219769719091609#m

[2023-11-16 18:30 UTC]