Show newer

@BeeGrrl @DevinRosychuk @djoseph626 @FlowersAgainst @scentedrose69 @TheFamousArtBR This is not at all true. I am sorry if you have experienced that hatred, but might I suggest you reap what you sow.

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/europesheila/

Don't think I'm giving too much away to sayI know a lot more about atolls than I used to.

#321 3/6 (100%)
🟩🟩⬜⬜⬜⬅️
🟩🟩🟩🟩⬜↘️
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🎉
worldle.teuteuf.fr

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/europesheila/

Not sharing this. It was toooo bad.

Wordle 537 X/6

⬜⬜⬜🟨🟨
⬜🟨🟨⬜⬜
🟨🟨⬜⬜⬜
🟨⬜🟨🟩🟩
🟩🟩⬜🟩🟩
🟩🟩⬜🟩🟩

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/europesheila/

@gibbsgirl21 Lorna, that post sums up exactly how I feel, too. Thank you for putting it into words. But PLEASE stop making me cry!

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/europesheila/

@CaroleInnes0 @Fintrayloon @AFCCT about how it planned to fund that. A few weeks ago one of the council’s directors wrote to AFC seeking information about the club’s intentions and how it planned to fund any development. The club then released its response to the council. Then all this kicked off in the media.5/

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/europesheila/

Show thread

@CaroleInnes0 @Fintrayloon @AFCCT though, does include a space for a stadium. That in no way implies that the Council would put funds into a stadium. Council staff have had conversations with the club about its interest in building a stadium at the beach but the club never provided any information4/

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/europesheila/

Show thread

@CaroleInnes0 @Fintrayloon @AFCCT at the beach. The Council has no knowledge of what he may or may not have said to AFC. The Council, though, never took any decision to invite AFC to build a new stadium at the beach or offered to put any funds into that. The Beach Masterplan,3/

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/europesheila/

Show thread

@CaroleInnes0 @Fintrayloon @AFCCT Long answer

It absolutely did not.

What seems to have happened is that a member of the former council administration (possibly Douglas Lumsden) approached AFC and suggested that, rather than pursuing its Kingswells development, it build a stadium 2/

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/europesheila/

Show thread

@CaroleInnes0 @Fintrayloon @AFCCT Short and long answer.

Short answer:- it didn’t 1/

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/europesheila/

@Fintrayloon @CaroleInnes0 @AFCCT which they understand has absolutely no interest in making use of such a stadium

2. To host rugby games the pitch area would have to be bigger than is apparently intended.
(I know this is true)

So, I kinda get their point.

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/europesheila/

Show thread

@Fintrayloon @CaroleInnes0 @AFCCT The Council believes the quality of the economic impact assessment is debatable. They understand for example, that although the assessment makes great play of bringing rugby games to the new stadium:

1. There has been no approach made to the SRU 3/

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/europesheila/

Show thread
Show older
Mastodon

A Mastodon forum for the discussion of European Union matters. Not run by the EU. Powered by PleromaBot, Nitter and PrivacyDev.net.