How can the EU-Commission argue that Hungarian judiciary reforms are sufficient when the government is breaking one milestone in order to achieve the other? Background: The law needed for completing Super-milestone No. 215 (Removing obstacles to references for preliminary rulings to the ECJ) was “discussed” in the legislative committee (TAB) on Thursday and is expected to be voted by MPs on Monday. How does this allow for the consultation of the National Judicial Council - as prescribed by Milestone Nr. 213?

🐦🔗: https://nitter.cz/daniel_freund/status/1733147687166304530#m

[2023-12-08 15:33 UTC]