Thoughts on EP debate:
As long as MS pursue sectorial priorities in their bilateral engagements w🇨🇳, we will continue having fragmentation & disunity in affairs!
 
The underlying problem remains a different one; it is time for a new 🇪🇺approach to🇨🇳
🧵1/4

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/IuliuWinkler/

As the geopolitical situation has shifted, so should our strategy:
👉 need a new approach built on the 2019 parameters of cooperation, competition & confrontation
👉 reinterpret this to the new realities of 2023
👉decoupling=not an option
👉focus on de-risking!
🧵2/4

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/IuliuWinkler/

Follow

Open Strategic Autonomy must be realised:
👉diversified/resilient supply chains abroad
👉industrial at home
🇪🇺 must rebalance economic relations w🇨🇳, including through strong autonomous instruments
🤝Engage 🌍partners&focus on rules/values
🧵3/4

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/IuliuWinkler/

· · mirror-bot · 1 · 0 · 0

❗️it must be stressed: maintaining status quo & geo-economic stability in Strait=key 🇪🇺 strategic interest
👉Lastly, it remains important that all EU institutions work in solidarity for the lifting of Chinese on elected and EU decision-making bodies
🧵4/4

🐦🔗: n.respublicae.eu/IuliuWinkler/

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Mastodon

A Mastodon forum for the discussion of European Union matters. Not run by the EU. Powered by PleromaBot, Nitter and PrivacyDev.net.