I was introducing someone I know to #Mastodon a few years back, starting with:
"So let's find a server that suits your niche interests. What are you looking for?"
...thinking that I knew all the fedi communities pretty well.

They responded cheekily "Is there a european-foreign-policy server?"

Of course I came up short, and they ended up making an account on a generalist server.

But fedi has grown a lot since!
So happy that eupolicy.social, respublicae.eu and social.network.europa.eu exist 🔥

accounts now have over 70,000 followers (not unique).

Under the hood, Mastodon keeps track of many more users who for some reason interacted with our instance. Over time that becomes rather wasteful, so we've finally activated regular data purging. Such hygiene saves us 200 GB in storage.

Even better, we no longer have to worry about holding potentially personal data about thousands of users for no reason. Our policy now looks better.

Our source is broken again, we'll reconsider the alternatives. (Such as self-hosting or switching to a Nitter source.)

Show thread

A suggestion for whoever sent a report about 40 posts and 90 images without comment: don't. Focusing just on the 3 most egregious, ideally with a comment, would have been enough to get us to moderate the account as we did.

has been upgraded to Mastodon v3.5.9, a security release.

The upgrade was painless. Thank you and especially @Claire[@]sitedethib.com for offering backports to pre-v4 releases and for the clear instructions.

While the details of CVE-2023-36459 have not been published yet, the title suggests the vulnerability may be exploitable even on an instance like ours where no third party can directly post anything.

[Annonce de service]

Notre service Nitter subit actuellement une interruption de service en raison de changements du côté de Twitter.
Le développeur de Nitter est au courant, nous vous tiendrons informé·es de l’évolution de la situation.

To reduce truncation errors, we caved and increased the character limit for posts to 2000 characters.

Show thread

mirrors are catching up on the recent posts, using RSS input for the ever-wonderful .

We're only able to get the 20 most recent posts from , so any account which posted more than that in the past ~2 weeks will have some posts missing. Some posts also get a bit messed up in the data conversion, so please be patient. (Most issues are already reported upstream.)

Please send patches or donations at pleromabot.robertoszek.xyz/ple!

Show thread

So it finally happened. The access used to update was cut off, all requests get an HTTP 401 response. Some discussion at

Venez nous retrouver aux @geekfaeries ! Notre stand se trouve au Village du Libre avec @Framasoft, @Mozilla et l' @aprilorg !
Et merci beaucoup @Pouhiou pour cette grue géante en crochet !! :blobcat_heartcat:

@HistoPol Thanks! Most mirrors are hosted without the original account's explicit cooperation. Hopefully, more MEPs and institutions will notice the benefits of the fediverse and take the lead themselves, so at some point we become redundant.

On you can also see a list of "official" fediverse accounts for MEPs and former MEPs:

@ombudsman We are glad to be competing in the prestigious #EOAward with #EUVoice and #EUVideo!
If you like our pilot project on alternative social media based on Open Source and #privacy oriented #mastodon and #peertube software, vote for us!

Due to the growth of the , which may have passed 10 million registered users depending how you count, we had to update our () disclosures.

Other possibilities exist. The principle of least astonishment could be a guiding factor:

We could mark posts from certain accounts unlisted if they regularly post to hashtags in ways which don't belong.

We could also forcefully add CWs to posts, but so far we don't. It's hard to come up with a CW which would be applicable for all accounts, or for entire classes of accounts equally. A catch-all CW like "From birdsite 🐦" is broadly correct but also potentially unhelpful.

Show thread

Some accounts with no followers are sometimes considered problematic too, even though they're hard to find. Someone may accidentally stumble on something they were not prepared for.

I've surveyed a few accounts from known-controversial quarters and I've marked a few as forced-sensitive. I've also disabled mirroring RTs where they're mostly not about EU policy.

Show thread

The has a page on "Appropriate behaviour rules":

The Rules of Procedure, at Rule 10(1), state that:

«The conduct of Members shall be characterised by mutual respect and shall be based on the values and principles laid down in the Treaties, and particularly in the Charter of Fundamental Rights. Members shall respect Parliament’s dignity and shall not harm its reputation.»


Rule 176 deals with sanctions.

Show older

A Mastodon forum for the discussion of European Union matters. Not run by the EU.